Unreal Nature

March 30, 2010

Because I Was Waiting

Filed under: Uncategorized — unrealnature @ 6:50 am

… I had a good idea, but I did not have a story. Critics talk as if stories were all idea, but intellect does not make story any more than ideology makes art. The story had to make itself, find its center, find its voice, Sutty’s voice. Then, because I was waiting for it, it could give itself to me.

Or put it this way: I had a lot of stuff in my head, good stuff, clear ideas — but I couldn’t pull it together, I couldn’t dance with it, because I hadn’t waited to catch the beat. I didn’t have the rhythm.

… What is it that prevents the ideas and visions from finding their necessary underlying rhythm, why couldn’t Woolf ”dislodge” them that morning?* It could be a thousand things, distractions, worries; but very often I think what keeps a writer from finding the words is that she grasps at them too soon, hurries, grabs; she doesn’t wait for the wave to come in and break. She wants to write because she’s a writer; she wants to say this, and tell people that, and show people something else, things she knows, her ideas, her opinions, her beliefs, important ideas … but she doesn’t wait for the wave to come and carry her beyond all the ideas and opinions, to where you cannot use the wrong word.

That is from an essay The Questions I Get Asked Most Often by Ursula K. LeGuin.

[* Well-known quote from Virgina Woolf, in a letter to Vita Sackville-West: " ... here am I sitting after half the morning, crammed with ideas, and visions, and so on, and can't dislodge them, for lack of the right rhythm. Now this is very profound, what rhythm is, and goes far deeper than words. A sight, an emotion, creates this wave in the mind, long before it makes words to fit it; and in writing (such is my present belief) one has to recapture this, and set this working (which has nothing apparently to do with words) and then, as it breaks and tumbles in the mind, it makes words to fit it...."]

-Julie

http://www.unrealnature.com/

10 Comments

  1. I love Le Guin on writing…

    Comment by Felix — March 30, 2010 @ 7:57 am

  2. I was reading that book of essays by Le Guin just recently. Another fine writer who writes on writing is Mary Oliver, but in general, I’d rather read her poetry.

    Comment by Jim Putnam — March 30, 2010 @ 8:15 am

  3. Felix,

    Yes, we know. You’d love Le Guin on boogers. (I’d love Le Guin on boogers; it would be awesome!)

    Jim,

    I just bought this book because I realized that I didn’t have a single book by Le Guin and I know that if Felix found that out, he’d think bad things about me (which he never does, otherwise).

    I had a photography post with quotes from Mary Oliver last fall. If you missed it, you might like it.

    Comment by unrealnature — March 30, 2010 @ 2:19 pm

  4. Le Guin on boogers?

    Is that a book or a restauant dish???

    Comment by Felix — March 30, 2010 @ 3:39 pm

  5. You are so prescient. (Did I spell that right? I don’t often talk to prescient people.) I wanted very much to say “You’d love Le Guin on ham and rye” — but then you don’t do ham and I couldn’t think of what Felix has on rye …

    I also am stricken because I meant to say something very extra clever about hectographing Sammy’s-dots and I … forgot. I am an old, fuddly person.

    Comment by unrealnature — March 30, 2010 @ 3:53 pm

  6. Oddly enough, I’m reading this while eating … legumes on houmous and rye.

    (The legumes are actually chopped cashews … but a cashew is a legume, and “legumes” went better with “le Guin”…)

    You cannot be old, because I am not, and you are younger than I. QED*. And I’m too fuddly to know about the other bit.

    *QED: “Quod Erat Demonstrandum” (Latin for QED)¹

    ¹Lennon, J., A Spaniard in the Works. 1965, London: Jonathan Cape.

    Comment by Felix — March 31, 2010 @ 9:14 am

  7. I’m interested in hearing what you think of an earlier essay in the same book, “About Feet”, page 160. I’ve been thinking about writing a blog entry about this and recently extracted the book to re-read what Le Guin had to say.

    Comment by Jim Putnam — March 31, 2010 @ 10:22 am

  8. A cashew is a nut. You are a nut. QED* You are a cashew. You are a legume.

    *QED: Quothe A Rat Dum De Dum De Dum

    Jim,

    I didn’t find that story to be convincing, though I enjoyed it. Women like there shoes (and male cross-dressers really like their shoes). Foot binding is/was incredibly awful, but humans have been and continue to do hideous things to their children of both genders to this day. Far worse is the bias against even giving birth to girls; The Economist recently ran a cover story on the missing millions of baby girls throughout the world. I was going to post about it but a blog post seemed to me to almost trivialize it. (I am pro-choice, but I think there is a profound difference between women choosing not to have a baby that they don’t want or are unable to care for and couples who are ready and willing to have a boy baby choosing to kill their girl babies).

    An example more comparable to the binding of girls feet might be the (male) castrati of Italy from several hundred years ago.

    However … however, if you like the essay, please do post about it. I would enjoy hearing a constrasting point of view.

    Comment by unrealnature — March 31, 2010 @ 2:50 pm

  9. With respect, and though reluctant to be labelled a casuist … a cashew (like a peanut) is not a nut. I willing confess to being a nut myself, and they say it takes one to know one…

    On high heels … I feel strongly about the issue, but have long stopped bothering to air my opinions. I’ll think about it, and maybe (or maybe not) pluck up the courage to make a post of my own.

    On female child murder … I certainly agree with JH about it, but I doubt the feasibility of comparing it with other horrors in terms of “better” or “worse” … exposing a female child, genitally mutilating a female child, breaking the feet of a female child …each is an obscenity in itself, not a point of a graduated scale.

    Comment by Felix — March 31, 2010 @ 4:43 pm

  10. You know, blog block can be just as overwhelming as writer’s block. Trust me (said Fozzy Bear) I know.

    Comment by Dr. C. — April 2, 2010 @ 12:53 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Theme: Shocking Blue Green. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.