<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talent in Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/talent-in-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/talent-in-photography/</link>
	<description>Are you sure it&#039;s not real? Could you please define &#039;real&#039;?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:53:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: unrealnature</title>
		<link>http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/talent-in-photography/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>unrealnature</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/?p=260#comment-194</guid>
		<description>David,

I think the key to Haggart&#039;s post is the &quot;in this industry&quot; part. He&#039;s talking about getting the for-hire job done by a deadline. Broening, Mann, and Doisneau, on the other hand, are trying to do something much harder, but they are able (if williing) to take a lifetime to do it. In both cases there has to be some talent (I think everybody would agree that there are people who don&#039;t have any talent for photography) but the commercial/editorial photographer has to be a quick and flexible and &quot;good enough&quot; while the art photographer has to get something much more than &quot;good enough&quot;. And please don&#039;t ask me to explain what I mean by &quot;more&quot;. I&#039;m working on it -- as is Doisneau.

Thanks for stopping by.

-Julie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I think the key to Haggart&#8217;s post is the &#8220;in this industry&#8221; part. He&#8217;s talking about getting the for-hire job done by a deadline. Broening, Mann, and Doisneau, on the other hand, are trying to do something much harder, but they are able (if williing) to take a lifetime to do it. In both cases there has to be some talent (I think everybody would agree that there are people who don&#8217;t have any talent for photography) but the commercial/editorial photographer has to be a quick and flexible and &#8220;good enough&#8221; while the art photographer has to get something much more than &#8220;good enough&#8221;. And please don&#8217;t ask me to explain what I mean by &#8220;more&#8221;. I&#8217;m working on it &#8212; as is Doisneau.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by.</p>
<p>-Julie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/talent-in-photography/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/?p=260#comment-193</guid>
		<description>In the same theme, Robert Doisneau said &quot;If I knew how to make a good photograph, I would do it every time.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the same theme, Robert Doisneau said &#8220;If I knew how to make a good photograph, I would do it every time.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
